User talk:Raymondskie99

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raymondskie99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just wanted to leave a message and sorry to @Loopy30: mostly because I went on my mind loopy personal attacked me but he wasn't, the way it put me in the guts that he blamed every ip address user that edits on megafauna article that it was me but still I was wrong in the first place, I mean I did stop making disruptive edits and you still banned my account, I will accept my suffering to wait 5 months before creating new account I mean I'm done with all the bullying and vandal since I'm grown up. I will miss Wikipedia already :( but please maybe if I will come back after 5 months and create an account can you stop banning me :( that will time will expire. and @Loopy30: I'm sorry for everything that i did I hope you forgive me since I'm hopeless already.

Decline reason:

You are not eligible for unblock consideration here. You must make your request with your original account. I'll note that you've demonstrated quite conclusively that you shouldn't be unblocked there, either, and have absolutely no intention of abiding by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yamla (talk) 11:48, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

EVerything

@Loopy30: I'm very sorry for everything hoping that you forgive me of what I did I feel the shame of it but at least stop blaming all IP address that edits that it was me though anyway again sorry I feel shame and hopeless this is not a drama. since I'm done already you can now focus at De la lombertie but please gather my article that I re-created one fauna species and the other one too, like the one I did to the Halitrephes maasi if you do that I will be thanking you very much, All the IP address starting with 40 and 175 was me, not the 50, @Loopy30: hoping you will reply at least once.

Original account

@Yamla: Judging by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raymondskie99, User:Raymondskie99 does appear to be this editor's oldest account and therefore the correct account from which to make an unblock request? So unless I'm mistaken, a WP:UTRS request from here after the WP:Standard offer period is the correct approach? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:33, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeap, that looks correct. I'll lift the talk page protection. --Yamla (talk) 12:45, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page protection lifted. That means the user doesn't have to use UTRS. Still, though, given the block evasion, homophobic personal attacks, and general awfulness, there's no real possibility of an unblock any time in the next six months. --Yamla (talk) 12:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks, though I'd support revoking talk page access again if we see an unblock request before the six month period is up. (And yes, I agree with the rest of what you say.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:52, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A batch of new socks and IP ranges were blocked today. The user has contacted me offwiki and been informed again of the standard offer, and that the clock is reset to 6 months. -- ferret (talk) 00:00, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A new sock was blocked this week on behavioral evidence. -- ferret (talk) 17:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SO Clock

Noting that this user was found to be socking and was blocked June 12, 2022. See User talk:BloatedBun. -- ferret (talk) 22:31, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User has an open UTRS appeal for standard offer now. -- ferret (talk) 22:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unban discussion

See WP:AN#Unban_request_for_Raymondskie99. If any questions are raised in that thread, you can respond here and someone will copy your response across. -- Yamla (talk) 21:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unban discussion was closed here. Your ban remains in place. In the future, no unban discussion will be considered until you successfully contest your global lock. --Yamla (talk) 11:14, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I was inclined to supported an unban, but was waiting for an unlock so that you could answer some questions. I'll go ask about it on Meta. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 16:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you're watching this, but if you are, I wanted to keep you informed that I received an answer from the Stewards and am following up on it at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee#3X ban appeal for locked user?. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 13:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]